New World
Order
T
|
he
term “New world order” has been used
to refer to any new period of history evidencing a dramatic change in the world
political thought and the balance of power. Despite various interpretations of
this term, it is primarily associated with the ideological notion of global
governance only in the sense of new collective efforts to identify the world
problems that go beyond the capacity of individual states to solve.
After
the cold war era, many changes occurred on the global political scenario that
characterized the new uni-polar world after the demise of USSR. The phrase “new
world order” was explicitly used in connection with Woodrow Wilson’s design in
the period just after the World War I. League of the nations was the product of
this ideology. The term fell from use when it became clear that League was not
living up to over optimistic expectations, and as a consequence was used very
little during the formation of UN (United Nations).
United
Nation was a projection of American dream into Europe and idea of new world
order was used to further the interests of British and Americans.
After
the cold war era, the new world order dealt with nuclear disarmament security
arrangements. The present circumstances have refocused the term on the super power
cooperation and regional crises.
In my
opinion, in the present world, resources are running out. A state cannot depend
upon its own resources for its survival. Globalization has linked the states in
a way that any one of them cannot survive without the help of other powerful
states exploit the resources of weaker states. Stats rich in energy resources
sell this energy to other states. Despite the progress that the human has made,
some of the characteristics are of Stone Age. We stile practice Barter system
where states rich in agricultural products sell this product to other states,
in return they got the resources which they need. In ancient times, powerful
tribes used to protect the smaller. It is being practiced today. So, different
states can progress by cooperation. For example, if we combine 10 families in a
house, they will be able to overcome the difficulties faced by a single house.
I suggest that states would also tend to make blocks and alliancesin the
new world order.
Unions
Unions and alliances had been made in the post on the basis of common
religion, race and language. European Union, USSR, East Africa and West Africa
etc. This old world order is in decline in my opinion.
USSR has
already been demolished. Other big alliance is Europe, which is also declining
due to Economic problems. The sole power USA also does not enjoy the power,
which a state in unipolar world should enjoy because of certain crises in the
USA. These unions were not made on the basis of justice rather; their main aim
was to exploit the weaker nations. My system supports unions in a way that will
help to construct a cooperative bilateral relationship, not a servant and
master relationship.
If we implement this ideology, I see different unions in the new world order.
Every state should be free to join union of its choice, which is compatible for
it. Asian, especially South Asian countries should also form a union naming
USSA (United States of South Asia) which will establish a powerful block in
Asia and all the states would be able to progress. Money spent on arms would be
diverted to the welfare of these countries. Pakistan and India, which would be
two major characters in this union, should solve their bilateral issues.
In my opinion, proposed unions would be following:
1. USSA
(United States of South Asia)
2. KASI
Union
3. Arabic
Union
4. European
Union
5. USSR
6. East
Africa
7. West
Africa
8. South
Africa
9. USA
10. ULA
(Union of Latin America)
11. UNA
(Union of New Zealand and Australia)
Names could be changed but it is my own opinion.
BLOCKS:
The
above discussion makes us believe that world would proceed and culminate into a
global village governed by super natural institutions. European Union is the
one example we have in front of us. Proposed unions would transform into blocks,
which would work under borderless economy in which states would not be able to
control their currency rates individually or protect their commodities.
Political
leaders will find themselves at the mercy of the people and institutions making
economic choices on which they do not have control. I perceive that regional
trade groupings like the North American free Trade Agreement and ECJ as well as
international trade agreements like the general agreement on trade and tariff
and World Trade Organization as manifestations of a new global Village
reflecting enormous and relatively recent historical transformations.
After the
unions, next step would be the formation of Blocks. When resources would run
out, unions would be transformed to blocks based on regional proximity.
It will be as follow:
ASIAN BLOCK
1. KASI
Union
2. USSA
(United States of South Asia)
3. ARAB
Union
4. UAE
5. Gulf
EUROPEAN BLOCKS
1. European
Union
2. USSR
and other East European countries
AFRICAN BLOCKS
1. East
Africa
2. West
Africa
3. South
Africa
4. Other
countries of the region
AMERICAN BLOCKS
1. USA
2. ULA
(Unions of Latin America)
3. Canada
NEW AUST BLOCK
1. UNA
(Union of New Zealand and Australia)
2. Other
countries in the region
In this way proposed fourteen unions would be divided into five blocks.
Countries would benefit from each other in many ways.
Social
democratic system proposed in the book would be perfect to govern these blocks.
This system is still in its early stages. This ideology needs resources to be
implemented.
Units
In
the context of September 11 attacks, which are believed to be perpetuated by
the Islamist extremists, has established an inevitable divide between Islam and
the west. According to the Islamic and Christianity beliefs, emergence of
Hazrat Imam Mehdi and Jesus Christ will happen which will divide the world in
two units.
So
theory of Clash of Civilizations becomes true. Some theorists consider that
western liberalism will dominate in the world, which will evolve liberal
democratic institutions. Resulting new world order will be characterized by the
international cooperation and free market economy. But in my view, western
values will not be accepted universally. Present resistance offered by certain
bodies like Al-Qaida is the most visible example.
In the end,
world would become bipolar. Two units would emerge. As history gives evidence,
according to Islamic and Christian belief, emergence of Hazrat Imam Mehdi and
Christ would happen. There would be two kinds of people in the world.
Ø Followers
Ø Liberals
UNIT 1 FOLLOWERS
1. Muslim
Countries
2. China
and Korean Peninsula
3. South
Asian Countries
4. USSR
5. African
Countries
UNIT 2 LIBERALS
1. USA
2. Europe
3. South
America
4. New
Zealand
5. Canada
This is not about the common people. Believers and non-believers exist in
the world but their main aim should be establish a peaceful and war free world
and humanity should be prioritized and dream of global village should be
fulfilled.
